Comparison of different machine learning classifiers for building extraction in LiDAR-derived datasets
Issue Date
2015
Abstract
Building extraction in remotely sensed imagery is an important problem that needs solving. It can be used to aid in urban planning, hazard assessments and disaster risk management among others. Light Detection and Ranging or LiDAR, is one of the most powerful remote sensing technologies nowadays. Many studies have used the fusion of LiDAR data and multispectral images in detecting buildings. This study seeks to maximize the power of LiDAR imagery to be able to classify buildings without the aid of multispectral imagery. This work follows the Object Based Image Analysis (OBIA) approach. Instead of the traditional pixel-based classification methods, pixels are segmented into logical groups called objects. From these objects, features for building extraction are calculated. These features are: the number of returns, difference of returns, and the mean and standard deviation of positive surface openness. These objects are then classified using different machine learning classifiers such as Support Vector Machines, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naïve Bayes Classifier, Decision Trees, and Random Forests. A comparative assessment was done on the performance of these different machine learning classifiers. The classifiers performed similarly with the Random Forest Classifier slightly outperforming the others.
Source or Periodical Title
ACRS 2015 - 36th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing: Fostering Resilient Growth in Asia, Proceedings
Page
1-10
Document Type
Conference Paper
Physical Description
illustrations, graphs
Language
English
Subject
Feature extraction, Object based image analysis
Recommended Citation
Escamos, I.M.H., Roberto, A.R.C., Abucay, E.R., Inciong, G.K.L., Queliste, M.D., Hermocilla, J.A.C. (2015). Comparison of different machine learning classifiers for building extraction in LiDAR-derived datasets. ACRS 2015 - 36th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing: Fostering Resilient Growth in Asia, Proceedings, 1-10.
Digital Copy
yes