Warfare in biodiversity hotspots
Issue Date
6-2009
Abstract
Conservation efforts are only as sustainable as the social and political context within which they take place. The weakening or collapse of sociopolitical frameworks during wartime can lead to habitat destruction and the erosion of conservation policies, but in some cases, may also confer ecological benefits through altered settlement patterns and reduced resource exploitation. Over 90% of the major armed conflicts between 1950 and 2000 occurred within countries containing biodiversity hotspots, and more than 80% took place directly within hotspot areas. Less than one-third of the 34 recognized hotspots escaped significant conflict during this period, and most suffered repeated episodes of violence. This pattern was remarkably consistent over these 5 decades. Evidence from the war-torn Eastern Afromontane hotspot suggests that biodiversity conservation is improved when international nongovernmental organizations support local protected area staff and remain engaged throughout the conflict. With biodiversity hotspots concentrated in politically volatile regions, the conservation community must maintain continuous involvement during periods of war, and biodiversity conservation should be incorporated into military, reconstruction, and humanitarian programs in the world's conflict zones. © 2009 Society for Conservation Biology.
Source or Periodical Title
Conservation Biology
ISSN
8888892
Volume
23
Issue
3
Page
578-587
Document Type
Article
Language
English
Subject
Biodiversity conservation, Biodiversity hotspots, Conflict, Protected areas, War, Warfare ecology
Recommended Citation
Hanson T, Brooks TM, Da Fonseca GA, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Machlis G, Mittermeier CG, Mittermeier RA, Pilgrim JD. Warfare in biodiversity hotspots. Conserv Biol. 2009 Jun;23(3):578-87.
Identifier
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01166.x
Digital Copy
yes