A critique of social research methodologies on gender relations in agriculture, fisheries and forestry

Professorial Chair Lecture

Metro Manila Commission Professorial Chair Lecture

Place

College of Arts and Sciences, UPLB, College, Laguna

Date

3-23-2000

Abstract

The paper critically examines the methods used in different studies on gender relations in agriculture, fisheries and forestry using a framework founded on two discourses: social research and epistemology; and gender relations for sustainable development. Fifty-two materials in the form of theses, research reports, monographs, and journal articles were reviewed.

The framework for the review examines the epistemology that underlies the choice of method and the kind of social research undertaken. The studies reviewed showed the overwhelming popularity of the survey method founded on a nomothetic epistemology. There were a few studies that utilized participant observation, key informant interviews, focus group discussion and life histories using the hermeneutic epistemology. The studies that showed the positive effects of development projects especially on women imply a step in the direction of a transformational epistemology,

Some of the studies on gender relations in agriculture, fisheries and forestry have contributed to bringing about greater recognition for the previously invisible activities and productive contributions of women. Other studies are instrumental in attaining the objectives of sustainable development as operationalized in upland development, conservation of mangrove and rice genetic resources, and land use. Suggestions are given to promote social research founded on multiple epistemologies using the gender relations approach especially in the context of sustainable development.

Location

UPLB Main Library Special Collections Section (USCS)

College

College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)

Language

English

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS